ADDENDUM TO 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04022 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: YES 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be allowed to serve in the enlisted force for one year to 
prove that he has the capacity to serve and complete his active 
duty service commitment (ADSC) for the cost of his advanced 
education at the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

A similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board, on 
2 Aug 11. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances 
surrounding the application, and, the rationale of the earlier 
decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at 
Exhibit F, with attachments. 

 

The applicant submits a request for reconsideration, contending 
now that he should be allowed to serve in the Air Force Reserve 
or the Regular Air Force for one year to prove that he has the 
capacity to serve in the enlisted force to reimburse the 
government for the cost of his advanced education at the USAFA. 
If not, then he should be given another option other than to 
monetarily pay for the cost of his education. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal 
statement; copies of letters of recommendation and commendation 
from former classmates and his employer; extracts from his 
official USAFA records, and other supporting documents. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit G. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

In an earlier finding, the Board determined there was 
insufficient evidence to warrant corrective action. We have 
reviewed the new information provided in support of his appeal; 


however, we do not find it sufficient to overturn the earlier 
decision of the Board. While we empathize with the applicant, 
we do not find that he has been the victim of an error or 
injustice. In view of the above, we find no basis upon which to 
recommend favorable consideration of the applicant’s request. 

 

The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) 
involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-04022 in Executive Session on 2 October 2012, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 15 Aug 11, 

 with exhibits. 

 Exhibit G. Letter, Applicant, dated 27 Feb 12, 

 with attachments. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair